Well hello! Glad you've dropped by. Feel free to have a good read, but you should know that
I'm no longer writing on this blog. The new blog is over here: Pursuit of Redemption.

Tag: Palin

Genius

Posted by – 9/9/08

Wow. The McCain campaign continues to make brilliant strategy moves. Maybe it’s because he’s a military man, but he’s been known to enjoy constantly out-flanking the media on multiple occasions. Just look at his Palin announcement! Want to really upset the media? Make them absolutely positive one thing is coming, and then pull the ole switcheroo.

Well now the campaign has the media by the ear and is dragging it to timeout. And the message the campaign is sending is loud and clear.

Hey… HEY! If you want to talk to our veep, you’ll play nice. Got it? GOT IT?

Until now, Palin hasn’t appeared for an interview. But this coming Thursday and Friday, she’ll sit down for an extensive two-day interview with ABC’s Charlie Gibson. Charlie’s been nice so far. So Charlie doesn’t get sent to his room with only bread and water like the rest of the bad media.

Russell Brand at the MTV Video Awards

Posted by – 9/8/08

Yes, this guy looks like he’s got it all together. One note to the Brits: we don’t take kindly to you coming across the pond and criticizing our country. Fix your own.

And he might want to think twice about using the word ‘retard’ in such a clearly derogatory manner mere days after the MSM experienced a backlash for its treatment of Palin’s son Trig, who has Down syndrome. Enjoy your progressive STD’s, sex addict.

Finally

Posted by – 9/8/08

So this might be a bit of a fluff piece, but frankly, if you’re going to do a story on a political candidate’s family, fluff is the way to go. Get hard hitting when you’re talking about their record.

McCain's ratings better than Obama?

Posted by – 9/5/08

THIS I did not expect. Palin? Sure. No one knew her, and lots wanted to find out who she is and what she has to say. But McCain? I suppose he’s fortunate that his lead-in was the opening game of the NFL season, non?

UPDATE: And here’s the reason the Democrats have legitimate reason to worry. According to Rasmussen in a poll out today…

Among unaffiliated voters, favorable opinions of McCain have increased by eleven percentage points in a week — from 54% before the Palin announcement to 65% today.

Cry and scream all you want about how unqualified she may be. From a strategic standpoint, this is a problem for you. Why? Because people not only seem to really like her, but the Democrats constant comparison of her to Obama has gotten people thinking. And that’s lead to this:

However, following the Wednesday night speech, voters are fairly evenly divided as to whether Palin or Obama has the better experience to be President. Forty-four percent (44%) of voters say Palin has the better experience while 48% say Obama has the edge. Among unaffiliated voters, 45% say Obama has better experience while 42% say Palin.

Palin's ratings bested Obama

Posted by – 9/4/08

So, in keeping with the Dems’ constant comparison of their ticket leader with the Republicans’ veep, I present this Nielsen report. Apparently, Obama’s speech garnered an impressive 38.4 million viewers. Certainly nothing to sneeze at. But the still virtually unknown Palin pulled in over 40 million. I submit that this obviously doesn’t bode well for the Obama/Biden ticket, but could even end up being a problem for McCain if he doesn’t play his cards right. I suppose, though, if there are enough people like me out there — people hoping that, at most, he’s a one-term president that can launch her into an 8 year term and are voting for the ticket because of that hope — he doesn’t really care.

UPDATE: Despite the complaints of Democrats about how much of a meanie she was in her speech, Rasmussen released these polling results on 9/5/08:

Fifty-eight percent (58%) of voters say that Palin’s speech helped McCain’s chances of becoming President while only 10% believe it hurt those prospects.

And this:

Forty percent (40%) now say that Palin is ready to be President, if necessary. That’s up from 29% last week. Forty-nine percent (49%) say the same about Biden.

However, following the Wednesday night speech, voters are fairly evenly divided as to whether Palin or Obama has the better experience to be President. Forty-four percent (44%) of voters say Palin has the better experience while 48% say Obama has the edge. Among unaffiliated voters, 45% say Obama has better experience while 42% say Palin.

Think about that. Only 40% of voters think Palin’s ready for the Presidency. Impressive for a newcomer perhaps, but damning for Obama considering that same poll revealed that people are divided on who’s got more experience — comparing a Presidential candidate to a Vice Presidential candidate! Clearly not a glowing endorsement of Obama.

On her convention speech

Posted by – 9/4/08

I think Outside the Beltway’s got a great redux of Palin’s speech last night. He lays out her exaggerations and the criticisms from the left, but rightfully adds,

Politics ain’t beanbag and convention speeches aren’t objective analysis.  Palin’s speech, like Obama’s, was good political theater that accomplished its goals.

Honestly, what’s your problem with last night’s speech, Dems? That she was mean? Come on, this is politics. Her attacks were against the ticket, not the ticket’s family members, so it was fair game. Of course you’ll have a problem with her speech, but it wasn’t meant for you. It was clearly meant to rally the base, and from the responses I’m reading, it accomplished the task. Maybe she didn’t cover things you wanted her to cover, but save that criticism for the end of the convention. (I’m still waiting to hear how Obama’s tax and spend plan that targets “the rich” isn’t going to be passed along to the end consumer, but alas…)

You shouldn’t be excited that everyone’s all over Palin’s speech. You should be worried that no one cared when Biden delivered the same thing.

Reason #76 why the Dems are scared

Posted by – 9/2/08

By now you’ve noticed that anytime executive experience is called into question, the Obamabots always draw the comparison between Obama’s leading of the campaign and Palin’s leading the town of Wasilla. In fact, listening to Obama on Anderson Cooper, you would’ve thought that Gov. Palin was still the mayor of the small town. (Also, mad props for continuing to minimize the small towns of America. That’s right in line with the bitter “flyover country” comments made during the first Bush election, and is sure to draw so many more to the party of sour grapes.)

Sure, at face value the Obama’s 17 months experienced campaigning looks more impressive than being mayor of a small town, but there’s two things of importance here.

First, heading a campaign full of staff and volunteers that weep when you speak isn’t much. Well, it is worthwhile and certainly says something, but it’s nothing like being head of a government. The weepers were clearly devoted already, they all showed up to support the candidate, and the whole thing will be gone once the election’s over. His agenda is their agenda, and they can be fired at any time. Getting fanatics to all move together in one direction isn’t terribly impressive, even if Obama had been able to do it. Unfortunately, he seems to throw his own staffers under the bus for misrepresenting him with startling regularity. (Also, the entire argument that he heads the campaign is misguided. He’s the talking head. Axelrod runs the campaign.)

Second, she’s not mayor anymore. Since being mayor of Wasilla, she was at the top of a state agency that regulated the multi-billion dollar natural resources of the oil and gas companies. Not only did she not have adoring fans there, she made some real enemies in rooting out the corruption. Now she’s Governor. Granted, she hasn’t been there long (only slightly longer than Obama’s been campaigning), but she’s already shaken things up there, with enemies all around her to boot. She’s getting things done in a major way despite the lack of adoring fans at every corner. (Don’t hear me wrong, the people of Alaska LOVE her; just look at her approval ratings. But the people she has to work with to pass legislation–those members of the established political order–are not quite as thrilled with her.)

I do hope the Dems keep drawing a comparison between the Republican VP pick and the head of their ticket. It makes him look like he’s running for Vice President, and he only ends up looking favorable against her to people who are resigned to vote for him anyway. What does it say about Palin that the entire Obamanation is in a frenzy trying to prove their guy can edge out the Republican #2? Want to compare apples to apples, VP to VP?

Sarah Palin received more votes for mayor of Wasilla, AK than did Joe Biden when he ran for president of the US.

On the other hand,

When Joe Biden ran for the office of President of the United States earlier this year, about 98.5% of Democrats rejected him, yet Obama ignored their opinions and place [sic] Biden in a position to be a heartbeat away from the presidency if elected.

To the disaffected conservative base, this woman was a Godsend. So I suppose they’re quite right in saying she was a terrible pick… for the Democrats.

Whoa, Kos

Posted by – 9/1/08

Impressive to see the Daily Kos completely ignorant of the fact that Obama is denouncing them for these salacious rumors. They seem to be congratulating Obama for taking a high road… against them.

When it became overwhelmingly obvious that they’d contrived something out of nothing, they finally admitted it. Good for them, but maybe in the future they can do research before they pull the trigger on the smear of a candidate’s daughter. Neither Palin’s nor Obama’s entry into the political realm makes their children “fair game.”

Yes, Palin really was pregnant.

Posted by – 9/1/08

Here’s proof. Do you really imagine the McCain vetting process was so very cursory that they’d to miss a faked pregnancy? You’ve really become quite delusional. The baby is clearly hers, quit talking about it. And for the love, you’re going after a 17 year-old girl and pointing out physical attributes that she may not be so proud of. Leave her alone.

Be careful in your "enlightened" analysis of Palin’s child

Posted by – 8/31/08

Those who know me are aware that my family has been blessed with Rebekah, the third of four children. Rebekah’s a smart, sneaky, hilarious young woman who is nearly 22 years old. Rebekah also has Down syndrome. It’s all caused by an extra 21st chromosome. Rebekah has more of something than most of the population, and it causes her to be slower both mentally and physically, but honestly, most of the time I forget. To us, she’s just Rebekah. And you’d better watch out, because she’s fully aware of people’s perceptions about her, and she’s more than willing to use it against you in one of her many sneaky attempts to get something out of you. She’s quite skilled in the appropriation of a Krispy Kreme and Diet Coke from a kind lady on any given Sunday morning at church, despite everyone’s awareness of her diabetes.

Growing up with a sister with Down syndrome seems quite normal to me. I can’t imagine anything else, and my parents have been absolutely wonderful in their raising of her. Unlike some other families we know, my parents disciplined Rebekah when she did something wrong. They didn’t let her get away with very much; at least, not any more than the rest of us got away with. Rebekah’s grown into a quite intelligent young woman who, despite her faults, does know the difference between right and wrong. Our family just doesn’t accept the idea that we’re unchangeable products of our environment. And Rebekah’s “affliction,” as I’ve seen Down syndrome referred to as of late, wasn’t a death sentence. She doesn’t have a horrible life. In fact, she seems to quite enjoy herself. For her, Prom came and went with zero drama. And if every girl there had been wearing her dress, too? She’d probably have been ecstatic: “Look at all my prom dress buddies!”

Get to know her, and you’ll notice something right away. Rebekah’s got too much love for others to not share it. The beginning of the Sunday morning church service doesn’t seem to be enough to get Rebekah to stop giving hugs and greeting everybody. Her friends have the diversity progressives can only dream about. She really couldn’t care any less about the color of your skin. Her best friend Keila is black. And she doesn’t seem to notice. She just knows that Keila is a lot of fun, and she wants to go bowling with her and the rest of her friends every Saturday at 2:00. (I normally get a text from Rebekah every Saturday around 3:30 to let me know her score. She can, and routinely does, trounce me. Without bumpers. Also, I now refuse to play Scrabble with her. There’s another example of using perceptions of her against you. Her vocabulary is surprisingly sharp.)

She’s clearly had an impact on the people in our community. Our parents arranged for us to each receive a book of congratulatory and encouraging notes from friends and family upon graduation from high school. Rebekah’s was at least three times the size of the rest of our books.

I write this because since the Palin nomination, there have been a slew of self-aggrandizing pundits that are sudden experts on a life with Down syndrome. And while the best of them are trying to be gentle with it, their choice of words shows how they feel about it. To them, hearing that you’re going to have a child with Down syndrome is terrible news. It means your life, and the child’s life, will be fraught with endless doctors visits and complications. It means you’re going to have a “retard” that won’t ever live up to your expectation. Your child will never be the sports star. He or she will never be very smart. It’s going to be so very hard, so why don’t you just abort the baby, right? It’s compassionate, really, because that kid’s life would just be so awful. Not even a life, not one worth living anyway.

It actually turned my stomach to write that, even with tongue firmly planted in cheek. This is the aggregate argument I’ve heard from the progressive left over the last two days. And it makes me so very sick. How dare you claim the right to decide someone else’s life for them? I thought being a progressive was all about creating maximum opportunity for individuals! Killing a living person certainly crushes that dream. Do you think I’m lying? Testing for Down syndrome has gotten more accurate and better at the earlier stages of pregnancy, and a recent study estimates that 91-93% of prenatal Down syndrome diagnoses end in abortion, with various other prenatally diagnosed diseases resulting in abortions to a lesser extent. (This, combined with the startlingly low rate of rape/incest/health-of-the-mother abortions, which sits somewhere at a measly 2-3%, should really be the death of the Pro-Choice movement for most reasonable people. If it’s not for you, grab a look at this chart, and I shall enjoy hearing your argument that abortion somehow isn’t post-coital birth control.)

In a piece written in the Washington Post several years ago about her experiences with a Down syndrome child, Patricia Bauer wrote:

In ancient Greece, babies with disabilities were left out in the elements to die. We in America rely on prenatal genetic testing to make our selections in private, but the effect on society is the same.

Maybe it’s the disgustingly high level of self regard we have as a society that enables justifying the abortion of any baby who might prove to be less than perfect. Our lives are so great, we think, that anything less would be “suffering.” And that is, in fact, the term that is used. And it is used by people who speak with authority in an attempt at compassion, but these fools clearly do not have love for any of these Down syndrome kids. How do I know? Because they observe from a distance. They do not speak with the experience that says, “I have intimately met some of them, and now I realize that they are people, too.” They speak with a ignorant arrogance.


Doctors used to call them “mongoloid idiots” and recommend locking them up in a mental institution. Now we’re so progressive, once prenatal tests reveal the “affliction,” we just kill them. You know, to save them from that horrible life they’ll surely have. Or is it to save ourselves from having to pour our lives into someone else? Tell me, how many kids with Down syndrome have you met that are suffering? I haven’t met any. And I’d wager that if you could actually come up with one example, their suffering would be the result of external factors rather than through mental or physical health complications.

Of course having Rebekah in the family has required extra effort! But her presence in my life has only added to my joy. My mother didn’t know Rebekah had Down syndrome until she looked at my sister’s eyes. But I am so very glad my mother didn’t listen to the “professionals.” A life where my experience with my sister consists of routine visits to some institution is wholly unimaginable to me.

So put your money where your mouth is; being enlightened means actually being even better informed. At least find a friend that has someone with Down syndrome in their family and talk to them at length before letting that overwhelming sense of always-rightness roll you right into making ignorant comments about a real person’s life.

UPDATE: It’s good to see that some pro-choice people are speaking out against the vitriol coming from the eugenics crowd:

Half the comments on Palin and her son Trig from etherpeoples seem to imply she is some kind of religious nutbar simply because she chose not to terminate her pregnancy. Or that she undertook her own misery in order to adhere to a misogynist value system.

Are we seriously not going to entertain the notion that she just plain wanted to complete her pregnancy and raise a child with Down syndrome? Seems perfectly rational to me.

UPDATE II: From a forum post I found here, another personal story about a fella with Down syndrome:

When I was thinking of Trig, I was reminded of an encounter I had a couple of weeks ago on the Delta Shuttle from Washington to New York. It was a mostly empty plane, but I went all the back to the very emptiest part of the plane to spread out and enjoy he quiet. And there was a man sitting in the very back row who immediately piped up, “Hi. I’m Ian. Would you like to sit next to me?”

He was a guy with Down syndrome, maybe in his twenties. I declined the offer, but we struck up a conversation. He was going to New York for a family celebration, including for his birthday. I told him I had a birthday coming up too and he lit up and came over to vigorously shake my hand in congratulations — more delighted by my birthday than his own.

When the plane began to fill up a woman and her daughter came all the way to the back with a huge bag. I began to wonder to myself if I should offer to help them with it, when Ian popped up, told them he’d get it, and lifted it up and shoved it in the overhead compartment. When two men came down the aisle with a box they weren’t sure would fit overhead, he intervened and told them it would — “trust me” — and put it up for them.

He chatted amiably with his neighbors during the flight, and when we landed was up out of his seat first thing to help that woman get her bag down.

From this brief encounter, I dare say Ian is friendlier, better adjusted and more considerate than about half of the people on the streets of Manhattan or San Francisco on any given day. Yet most of those people are perfectly unperturbed by the elimination of babies with Down syndrome in the womb. To hell with them. God bless Sarah Palin for bringing Trig into the world, and may he shower those around him with as much sunshine as the gentleman I met on that flight.